I just finished reading a post on the Happy Hospitalist blog on a friend’s suggestion.
The hospitalist is upset at a potential blurring of lines between NPs and Doctors, at least in the eyes of the public. He or she worries that patients will be at risk because they won’t know the difference between their NP and their doctor. It would however have to be ongoing and intentional misrepresentation by the NP to be damaging to the patient. An unlikely scenario.
Anyway, one of the key elements of the Hospitalist’s argument is that differential diagnosis is the great divider between disciplines (at least in the eyes of the public). A differential diagnosis is a systematic method used by physicians to diagnose based on symptoms. The nursing equivalent is what is known simply as nursing intuition.
Kim, an RN, replied to the Happy Hospitalist post: “I appreciate the inability to articulate the differential diagnosis process because I have difficulty articulating the “gut” feelings and intuition that come only with years of practice as a registered nurse. Thousands of hours of taking care of patients. For you, you can name fifty differential diagnoses. For me, it means knowing long before any “quality indicators” suffer, that my patient is sinking.”
The point being is that there are many differences between nursing and medicine. What the blogger seems to completely miss however is that each discipline has a role to play. There is no reason why one discipline cannot balance the other. It’s what doctors and nurses have been doing all along after all.
But this blogger seems to fear the points where the two specialties meet and at times cross. Boiled down, I think the post is simply a territorial rant over long disputed nurse/doctor boarders that states a rather obvious point: NPs and doctors are different. Go figure.
I believe the blogger speaks from a US health care perspective where NPs have a much broader interhospital-role than they currently do Canada. However, there is no doubt that Canada will see an increasingly stronger NP role being played out in public health care. Canada is also seeing and will see its fair share of territorial disputes in this area.
The most important point I realized in all of this is that health care can no longer be supported by only one discipline and there is ample room, as well as great need, for others to share responsibility. There is also no reason why each discipline can’t work and grow together.